A Set-Valued Variational Analysis Framework for Uncertain Energy Resource Allocation Problems
Keywords:
Set-valued analysis, variational inequality, distributionally robust optimization, wasserstein ambiguity set, energy resource allocation, generalized Nash equilibrium, conditional value-at-risk.Abstract
The broad deployment of uncertain intermittent renewables and weather driven fluctuations in load brings uncertainty to energy resource allocation, and single valued stochastic programs calibrated at a single fix nominal probability distribution may not capture this uncertainty. The underlying reason is that the feasibility regions for the dispatch can alter themselves set valued with the uncertainty reality not becoming smaller to a single defined set. In the present work introduce a set-valued variational analysis frame to describe the energy system and network-based dispatch feasibility as a mapping from uncertainty to allocation subsets, and an optimal fair allocation is interpreted as a minimax distributionally robust program for an ambiguity set which includes Wasserstein balls for probability laws to be acceptable. Using the idea of conditional value-of-risk reformulate robust chance constraints with use of generalized subdifferential calculus and develop Fritz-John type optimality conditions for the problem based on normality cones as well as horizon maps for graphical convergence. Generalized Hukuhara and second order proto differentiability for the feasibility map enables precise analysis of optimal solution’s sensitivities based on ambiguity radius, and generalized-Nash equilibrium offers models for problems involving competitions among agents. The study demonstrates convergence properties of the sample average approximate scheme and establish a concentration bound related to cascading allocation failure events. The methodology is validated with numerical case studies illustrating the comparison between an iterative fixed point scheme and a inexact Newton type approach. An estimate of growth for allocation deficiencies according to ambiguity radius is quantitatively verified.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

