Causal Cross-Modal Consistency and Contradiction Learning for Explainable Video–Audio–Text Fake News Detection
Keywords:
Causal reasoning; Contradiction detection; Explainable artificial intelligence; Fake-news detection; Multimodal learning; Reliability modelling; Temporal alignmentAbstract
With the advent of the increasingly large amounts of multimedia news, the fake-news detection problem has become a complex one that requires gathering evidence from different types of media: a video could contain a credible but incomplete record of events, an audio record a convincing but contradictory account of what happened, and a text provide only a partial and incorrect view of the events. In this work, a Causal Cross-Modal Consistency and Contradiction Learning (C³L) framework is proposed to aid in making explainable video–audio text fake-news detection. Four key aspects related to modelling, viz. representation learning of the modalities, temporal cross-modal alignment, explicit consistency and contradiction representations, and causal relation modelling, are combined along with modality-reliability estimation and evidence oriented explainability into a single architecture. Unlike typical multimodal fusion, that is mainly focussed on the fusion of heterogeneous representations, it takes into account the question of whether multimodal evidence is temporally aligned, consistent, contradictory and even reliable enough for the decision-making. The proposed framework was compared on unimodal baseline, established multimodal approaches, consistency-based approach, and the video audio–text state-of-the-art approach by using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score and AUC. With the considered experimental setup the C³L produced an accuracy of 93.0%, a precision of 93.5%, a recall of 92.5%, an F1-score of 93.0% and an AUC of 95.5%. In comparison to the analysed state-of-the-art video–audio–text approach, the framework's results showed an increase of 4.5, 5.0, 5.0, 5.0 and 4.0 percentage points in terms of Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1–score, and AUC, respectively. The results show that explicit modelling of the cross-modal relationship enhances the multimodal authenticity assessment over aggregating the features. The explainability mechanism also provides modality, time, and cross-modal evidence leading to predictions. However, the results of the performance depend on the data set and quality of the input, the concept of data temporal synchronization and manipulation strategies that evolve. The proposed framework is structured and offers strong, interpretable, and causally-meaningful support for a robust multimodal fake-news detection system. These findings form a solid evidence-based foundation for enhanced trustworthy and transparent automated misinformation analysis in the presence of different multimedia contexts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

