Multi-Objective Reliability–Cost Optimization of Repairable Industrial Systems under Pythagorean and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Kolmogorov Uncertainty
Keywords:
Pythagorean fuzzy sets; Intuitionistic fuzzy sets; Multi-objective optimization; Particle swarm optimization; NSGA-II; MOEA/D; Kolmogorov differential equations; Weibull hazard; System availability; Maintenance cost.Abstract
This study presents a comparative optimization methodology for repairable industrial systems subject to generalized fuzzy uncertainty. We incorporate Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFS) into dynamic Markov availability models and evaluate their behavior alongside standard intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFS). The quadratic boundary of PFS expands non-membership supports by approximately 28% relative to the linear IFS boundary. This geometric expansion produces more conservative availability estimates, which accurately mirror epistemic ambiguity in operational failure and repair records. Three metaheuristic algorithms—multi-objective particle swarm optimization with an external repository (MOPSO), non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA II), and decomposition-based evolutionary optimization (MOEA/D)—are tested on two full-scale plants: a rice milling facility and a thermal power station. Both systems are modeled through Kolmogorov differential systems coupled with time-dependent Weibull failure hazards. The optimization problem simultaneously maximizes steady-state availability and minimizes lifecycle maintenance expenses while satisfying operational availability thresholds. Across five independent random seeds, MOPSO achieves superior hypervolume values (112,640 for the rice mill and 399,893 for the thermal plant) and the lowest inverted generational distance, whereas NSGA-II exhibits uniform solution spread. Transitioning from IFS to PFS shifts Pareto frontiers toward lower availability and higher maintenance expenditure. Time-dependent Weibull hazards reduce knee-point availability by 5% to 7% compared to constant-rate models. These findings emphasize the practical necessity of accounting for component aging and broader non-membership margins during system planning.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

